Skip to main content

How to recover a SAM project

How to find a SAM_PROJECT name for a job:

$ vi /work/landshark-clued0/weigang/Winter2010/check_data.log
"Reading /prj_root/2671/top_write/weigang/SingleTop2010Summer2009Extended/RunIIa/data/p17_CC_Data_PreTag_0_20091231120843-2953530.d0cabsrv1.fnal.gov/cafe.out
Number of processed events: 38749635
Reading /prj_root/2671/top_write/weigang/SingleTop2010Summer2009Extended/RunIIa/data/p17_CC_Data_PreTag_0_20091231120843-2953564.d0cabsrv1.fnal.gov/cafe.out
Number of processed events: 39353873
Processed[expected] events: 39353873[39381649] BAD"

look for any job name that belongs to a BAD project. then,

$ find /d0mino/weigang -name "*2953564*"
$ vi /d0mino/weigang/p17_CC_Data_PreTag_0.o2953564
"SAM_PROJECT    = weigang_13105_20091231120843"

Liang showed how to do it easier way:
$ cat  /d0mino/weigang/*.o3447239 | grep SAM_PROJECT
SAM_PROJECT    = weigang_4789_20100227000742

($ setup sam)
$ sam generate strict recovery project --project=weigang_13105_20091231120843 --printQuery
(snapshot_id 2600391 minus (consumer_id 4024850 and consumed_status consumed)) or (consumer_id 4024850 and cf_pid 36006704)

$ sam translate constraints --dim="(snapshot_id 2600391 minus (consumer_id 4024850 and consumed_status consumed)) or (consumer_id 4024850 and cf_pid 36006704)" | grep "Total Event Count"


check if this number + the processed number = expected total number of events.

if yes,
created a recovery def name:
$ sam create definition --defname="singletop_recovery_p20mu_201002261404" --dim="(snapshot_id 2136982 minus (consumer_id 4125778 and consumed_status consumed)) or (consumer_id 4125778 and cf_pid 36666193,36666198,36666273,36666274,36666283,36666307)"
DatasetDefinition saved with definitionId = 1948007

find the BAD definition and created a submission script:

$ top_cafe/configs/singletop/SingleTopDriver.sh -r p20 -a MU -o . WPlusJets | grep CSG_alpgenpythia_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_p211100_v3
runcafe -no-outdir-check -jobs=70 -outdir=. -name=p20_MU_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_PreTag -def=CSG_alpgenpythia_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_p211100_v3 -tar=./jobtarball_26-Feb-2010.tar.gz -- top_cafe/configs/singletop/mujets_p21/MC_SingleTopMuJets_Signal_RunIIb_recaf.config VJets.Analysis: MU VJets.TempTree: TMBTree +USER.Run: Group\(VJetsWPtReWeight\) VJets.WMCType: AlpgenToNLO +USER.Run: TopHistos\(histos_pretag\) histos_pretag.DoMC: true cafe.Output: p20_MU_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_Topo.root mcweight.CSGAlpgenNLONorm: true VJets.IsHeavyFlavorSkimmed: true VJets.SAMDefName: CSG_alpgenpythia_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_p211100_v3 csg_sample.fwk_pXX: p211100 csg_sample.version: v3

change the def name to the recovery def name you just created. reduce the job number to 5 or as needed and run it:

$ runcafe -cabsrv1 -no-outdir-check -jobs=5 -outdir=. -name=p20_MU_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_PreTag -def=singletop_recovery_p20mu_201002261404 -tar=./jobtarball_26-Feb-2010.tar.gz -- top_cafe/configs/singletop/mujets_p21/MC_SingleTopMuJets_Signal_RunIIb_recaf.config VJets.Analysis: MU VJets.TempTree: TMBTree +USER.Run: Group\(VJetsWPtReWeight\) VJets.WMCType: AlpgenToNLO +USER.Run: TopHistos\(histos_pretag\) histos_pretag.DoMC: true cafe.Output: p20_MU_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_Topo.root mcweight.CSGAlpgenNLONorm: true VJets.IsHeavyFlavorSkimmed: true VJets.SAMDefName: CSG_alpgenpythia_w+0lp_lnu+0lp_excl_p211100_v3 csg_sample.fwk_pXX: p211100 csg_sample.version: v3

if not,
get summary of the project:
$ sam get project summary --project=weigang_13105_20091231120843 > & summary.log
$ vi summary.log
search:
/:\ delivered
"   Consumer process ID: 36006704
   Process description: 2953566.d0cabsrv1.fnal.gov
      Process status                 : completed
      Number of files consumed       :        6
      Number of files delivered      :        1
      Number of files failed         :        0
      Number of files skipped        :        0
      Number of files unknownStatus  :        0
      Last consumed file             : vjets-recaffed-ejets-fall2008_CAF-CSGv1-CSskim-EMinclusive-20060209-003700-2023451_p17.09.03_130302_p18.13.00.root
      Last consumed file status      : delivered"

go to the job output directory:
$ cd /prj_root/2671/top_write/weigang/SingleTop2010Summer2009Extended/RunIIa/data/
look for that job output:
$ ls -d *2953566*
$ cd p17_CC_Data_PreTag_0_20091231120843-2953566.d0cabsrv1.fnal.gov/
check the number of events of that job:
$ vi cafe.out

SAM thinks these events are not consumed (missing), while CAFE thinks it's processed. so
==> # of events processed by CAFE - # of events of this job + # events missing by SAM = total expected # events

total expected # of events = snapshot_id events.

******then remove this job and run the recovery script?

if # processed events > # expected events, just rerun the definition.
--> find the bad definition in check_output.log
--> delete all outputs related to that definition, using the pattern in check_output.log:
easily see by eyes, but you can double check by comparing ls the pattern and grep the same pattern in the check_output.log, e.g.
$ ls p20_MU_w+w_* | wc
$ grep p20_MU_w+w_ check_diboson.log | wc
grep = ls + 1, due to one more line providing the pattern.
--> create the submission script by SingleTopDriver.sh:
$SRT_LOCAL/top_cafe/configs/singletop/SingleTopDriver.sh -r p20 -a MU -o . -s cabsrv1 Diboson | grep CSG_pythia_w+w_incl_p211100_v3
runcafe -no-outdir-check -jobs=6 -outdir=. -name=p20_MU_w+w_incl_PreTag -def=CSG_pythia_w+w_incl_p211100_v3 -tar=./jobtarball_26-Feb-2010.tar.gz -- top_cafe/configs/singletop/mujets_p21/MC_SingleTopMuJets_Signal_RunIIb_recaf.config VJets.Analysis: MU VJets.TempTree: TMBTree +USER.Run: TopHistos\(histos_pretag\) histos_pretag.DoMC: true cafe.Output: p20_MU_w+w_incl_Topo.root mcweight.CSGAlpgenNLONorm: true VJets.SAMDefName: CSG_pythia_w+w_incl_p211100_v3 csg_sample.fwk_pXX: p211100 csg_sample.version: v

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,