Skip to main content

InfiniBand

InfiniBand (IB) is a computer networking communications standard used in high-performance computing that features very high throughput and very low latency. It is used for data interconnect both among and within computers. InfiniBand is also used as either a direct or switched interconnect between servers and storage systems, as well as an interconnect between storage systems.
As of 2014, it was the most commonly used interconnect in supercomputers. Mellanox and Intel manufacture InfiniBand host bus adapters and network switches, and, in February 2016, it was reported that Oracle Corporation had engineered its own InfiniBand switch units and server adapter chips for use in its own product lines and by third parties.[1] Mellanox IB cards are available for Solaris, FreeBSD,[2][3] RHEL, SLES, Windows, HP-UX, VMware ESX,[4] and AIX.[5] It is designed to be scalable and uses a switched fabric network topology.
As an interconnect, IB competes with Ethernet, Fibre Channel, and Intel Omni-Path.
The technology is promoted by the InfiniBand Trade Association.

Specification[edit]

Performance[edit]

Characteristics
 SDRDDRQDRFDR10FDREDRHDRNDRXDR
Signaling rate (Gbit/s)2.551010.312514.0625[6]25.7812550100250
Theoretical effective throughput (Gb/s)[7]
... for 1 link
2481013.642550100250
... for 4 links816324054.541002004001000
... for 8 links16326480109.082004008002000
... for 12 links244896120163.6430060012003000
Encoding (bits)8b/10b64b/66bt.b.d.t.b.d.
Adapter latency (µs)[8]52.51.30.70.70.5less?t.b.d.t.b.d.
Year[9]2001, 200320052007201120112014[7]2017[7]after 2020future (after 2023?)
Links can be aggregated: most systems use a 4× aggregate. 8× and 12× links are typically used for cluster and supercomputer interconnects and for inter-switch connections.
InfiniBand also provides RDMA capabilities for low CPU overhead.

Topology[edit]

InfiniBand uses a switched fabric topology, as opposed to early shared medium Ethernet. All transmissions begin or end at a channel adapter. Each processor contains a host channel adapter (HCA) and each peripheral has a target channel adapter (TCA). These adapters can also exchange information for security or quality of service (QoS).

Messages[edit]

InfiniBand transmits data in packets of up to 4 KB that are taken together to form a message. A message can be:

Physical interconnection[edit]

InfiniBand switch with CX4/SFF-8470 connectors
In addition to a board form factor connection, it can use both active and passive copper (up to 10 meters) and optical fiber cable (up to 10 km).[10] QSFP connectors are used.
The InfiniBand Association also specified the CXP connector system for speeds up to 120 Gbit/s over copper, active optical cables, and optical transceivers using parallel multi-mode fiber cables with 24-fiber MPO connectors.[citation needed]

API[edit]

InfiniBand has no standard API. The standard only lists a set of verbs such as ibv_open_device or ibv_post_send, which are abstract representations of functions or methods that must exist. The syntax of these functions is left to the vendors. Sometimes for reference this is called the verbs API. The de facto standard software stack is developed by OpenFabrics Alliance. It is released under two licenses GPL2 or BSD license for GNU/Linux and FreeBSD, and as Mellanox OFED for Windows (product names: WinOF / WinOF-2; attributed as host controller driver for matching specific ConnectX 3 to 5 devices)[11] under a choice of BSD license for Windows. It has been adopted by most of the InfiniBand vendors, for GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, and Windows. IBM states this at their knowledge center on verbs API:
An AIX® application can determine the verbs API that is either the Open Fabrics Enterprise Distribution (OFED) verbs or the AIX InfiniBand (IB) verbs that must communicate with a specific destination.[12]
A presentation from Mellanox Technologies, dated 2014, with title "Verbs programming tutorial" states on page 31:[13]
  • libibverbs, developed and maintained by Roland Dreier since 2006, are de facto the verbs API standard in *nix
    • Developed as an Open source
    • The kernel part of the verbs is integrated in the Linux kernel since 2005 – Kernel 2.6.11
    • Inbox in several *nix distributions
    • There are level low-level libraries from several HW vendors

History[edit]

InfiniBand originated in 1999 from the merger of two competing designs: Future I/O and Next Generation I/O. This led to the formation of the InfiniBand Trade Association (IBTA), which included Compaq, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, and Sun. At the time it was thought some of the more powerful computers were approaching the interconnect bottleneck of the PCI bus, in spite of upgrades like PCI-X.[14] Version 1.0 of the InfiniBand Architecture Specification was released in 2000. Initially the IBTA vision for IB was simultaneously a replacement for PCI in I/O, Ethernet in the machine room, cluster interconnect and Fibre Channel. IBTA also envisaged decomposing server hardware on an IB fabric. Following the burst of the dot-com bubble there was hesitation in the industry to invest in such a far-reaching technology jump.[15]

Timeline[edit]

  • 2001: Mellanox ships InfiniBridge 10Gbit/s devices and ships over 10,000 InfiniBand ports.[16]
  • 2002: adoption takes a setback when Intel announces that instead of shipping IB chips it would focus on developing PCI Express, and Microsoft discontinues IB development in favor of extending Ethernet, although Sun and Hitachi continue to support IB.[17]
  • 2003: Virginia Tech builds an InfiniBand cluster ranked number three on the Top500 at the time.
  • 2004: IB starts to see adoption as a clustering interconnect, beating Ethernet on latency and price.[15] The OpenFabrics Alliance develops a standardized, Linux-based InfiniBand software stack. The following year Linux adds IB support.[18]
  • 2005: IB begins to be implemented as an interconnect for storage devices.[19]
  • 2009: of the top 500 supercomputers in the world, Gigabit Ethernet is the internal interconnect technology in 259 installations, compared with 181 using InfiniBand.[20]
  • 2010: Market leaders Mellanox and Voltaire merge, leaving just one other IB vendor, QLogic, primarily a Fibre Channel vendor.[21] Oracle makes a major investment in Mellanox.
  • 2011: FDR switches and adapters announced at the International Supercomputing Conference.[22]
  • 2012: Intel acquires QLogic's InfiniBand technology.[23]
  • 2016: Oracle Corporation manufactures its own InfiniBand interconnect chips and switch units.[24]
  • 2019: Nvidia acquired Mellanox for $6.9B[25]

Ethernet over InfiniBand[edit]

Ethernet over InfiniBand, abbreviated to EoIB, is an Ethernet implementation over the InfiniBand protocol and connector technology.
EoIB enables multiple Ethernet bandwidths varying on the InfiniBand (IB) version.
Ethernet's implementation of The Internet Protocol Suite, usually referred to as TCP/IP, is different to some of the implementations used on top of the InfiniBand protocol in IP over IB (IPoIB).
Ethernet over InfiniBand performance
TypeLanesBandwidth (Gbps)Compatible Ethernet Type(s)Compatible Ethernet Quantity
SDR12.5GbE to 2.5 GbE2 x GbE to 1 x 2.5 GbE
410GbE to 10 GbE10 x GbE to 1 x 10 GbE
820GbE to 10 GbE20 x GbE to 2 x 10 GbE
1230GbE to 25 GbE30 x GbE to 1 x 25 GbE + 1 x 5 GbE
DDR15GbE to 5 GbE5 x GbE to 1 x 5 GbE
420GbE to 10 GbE20 x GbE to 2 x 10 GbE
840GbE to 40 GbE40 x GbE to 1 x 40 GbE
1260GbE to 50 GbE60 x GbE to 1 x 50 GbE + 1 x 10 GbE
QDR110GbE to 10 GbE10 x GbE to 1 x 10 GbE
440GbE to 40 GbE40 x GbE to 1 x 40 GbE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,