Skip to main content

Why Your Capital One Investing Brokerage Account Is Moving to E*Trade

If you use Capital One Investing to trade stocks, your account will be moved to E*Trade later in 2018. Here's why more mergers and acquisitions are in the cards for the online discount brokerage industry.

Jan 29, 2018 at 9:30AM
Investors who use Capital One's (NYSE:COF) brokerage to place trades will soon find their accounts at E*Trade (NASDAQ:ETFC). It's the latest deal in the discount brokerage industry, where companies are pairing up in an effort to survive and thrive in a world where commissions are racing toward zero and upstarts like Robinhood threaten the business of paid-for stock trades altogether.

What's going on?

E*Trade is buying more than 1 million self-directed brokerage accounts from Capital One Investing, meaning taxable accounts or IRAs that clients manage on their own, for example. Notably, the deal doesn't involve small-business 401(k) plans administered by Capital One.
$100 bills in short glass jar
Image source: Getty Images.
On its conference call, E*Trade CEO Karl Roessner described it as "essentially an account scrape." In short, if you currently use Capital One Investing, you'll likely go to bed one night as a Capital One Investing customer and wake up the next day as an E*Trade customer.
Your assets (cash, stocks, etc.) will move automatically, as will certain account history and other information, according to a notice issued by Capital One. The official move will happen later in 2018, though no firm timeline is in place right now. Until then, customers can continue to use Capital One Investing just as they always have.
If you want to move your account to a different broker before the move to E*Trade, keep in mind that Capital One Investing charges a fee of up to $75 to transfer your account. (For what it's worth, a full transfer of an account out of E*Trade also carries a $75 ACAT fee, so there's no reason to rush to find a new home for your account.)

Why Capital One customers are moving

Realistically, brokerage was never really a big business for Capital One. Before it was Capital One Investing, the brokerage service operated under the name ShareBuilder, which came along for the ride when Capital One acquired online bank ING Direct in 2012.
Capital One's brokerage has a lot of accounts, but its clients tend to have less in assets and trade less frequently than clients of competing brokerage services. The average Capital One Investing account makes roughly one trade per quarter, whereas E*Trade's brokerage accounts place about four trades per quarter. Likewise, the average Capital One Investing account has no more than $18,000 of assets, whereas the average E*Trade account has more than five times as much, or about $93,600 at the end of the fourth quarter.
The deal makes sense for both E*Trade and Capital One. E*Trade will acquire more than 1 million customers in one fell swoop at a price less than what it typically spends to sign up a new customer, according to conference call commentary. Capital One will part with an ancillary business that is a mere rounding error compared to its credit card and commercial banking units.

The rapidly shrinking brokerage industry

In the last few years, we've seen a number of mergers and acquisitions among online discount brokers. Smaller brokers are selling out as commissions decline and rivals look to scale in a bid to generate better margins at lower price points. Some of the biggest deals are included in the table below.
Acquiring Broker What It Bought Deal Closing Date
E*Trade Capital One Investing accounts TBD
TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ:AMTD) Scottrade Sept. 2017
E*Trade  OptionsHouse Sept. 2016
Ally Financial (NYSE:ALLY) TradeKing June 2016
Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCHW) OptionsXpress Aug. 2011
Data source: Company press releases.
Charles Schwab and Fidelity really turned up the heat on competitors last year when, in a series of back-and-forth commission cuts, they ultimately dropped commissions to $4.95 per online stock trade. As rivals made noise by slashing commissions, TD Ameritrade and E*Trade had little recourse but to join in, reducing standard stock commissions to $6.95 per trade.
On a long enough timeline, it appears that commission prices will ultimately go to zero. Some brokers can afford to compete aggressively on price, including Schwab and Fidelity, which derive most of their revenue and profit from fee-based services and traditional banking operations. TD Ameritrade has made moves to shift toward products and services that generate recurring revenue in light of commission declines, most recently by reworking its list of commission-free ETFs.
Many believe that the brokerage industry is only in the early innings of a merger and acquisition spree. The Wall Street Journal reported last year that E*Trade's executives were given an ultimatum: Meet growth targets or the board will consider strategic alternatives, including selling the brokerage.
On its fourth-quarter conference call, one analyst asked E*Trade management if recent deal announcements might stand in the way of a possible sale of the business. Roessner responded that they would not, saying, "I like both of these deals, and I think, you know, whoever the ultimate shareholders are of this company, they're going to like them, too."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,