Skip to main content

Fwd: Racial Incidents on Campus

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lou Anna K. Simon, President <presmail@msu.edu>
Date: Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM
Subject: Racial Incidents on Campus
To: MSU Students <msustudents@msu.edu>


October 4, 2011

Dear MSU Student:

I have been made aware of a recent incident on campus involving
graffiti with a racial/ethnic slur directed at an individual student
on the door of the student's room. Shortly after this incident, I was
also made aware of an incident involving the same racial epithet
written on the walls of a different residence hall, along with
sexually explicit graphics on several walls in the same residence
hall. In this case, the vandalism was discovered in the early hours of
the morning and removed very quickly by staff.

Both incidents were immediately dealt with by Interim Vice President
Maybank, Assistant Vice President Gore, and the Campus Living staff.
Importantly, their first concern was the well-being of the individual
student affected in the first incident. They also communicated with
students in residence halls alerting them to the incidents and staff
began to implement support programming. Dr. Maybank initiated
communication with the student leadership. This work is on-going. I am
very concerned about this behavior and its impact on individual
students and our University community. Such behavior is not
representative of MSU's values nor should it be tolerated.

It should go without saying that the University supports free speech
including the use of words that are offensive to most in our
community. However, given the nature of these incidents, the MSU
police were immediately contacted and the matter has been turned over
to them to investigate, not only as a form of vandalism, but also as
potential ethnic intimidation. I am personally awaiting the outcome of
the police investigation.

Regrettably as I was preparing to send this letter to you today, I was
made aware of a third incident of racial/ethnic intimidation on
campus. The MSU police have been asked to investigate this incident
individually and as part of this rash of incidents. In my many years
at MSU, this rash of incidents at various parts of the campus in such
a short timeframe is unmatched, is extraordinarily troubling and
creates a legitimate concern that all of us must address.

Acts of this nature have resulted in members of the community feeling
threatened and devalued. As a member of the MSU community we ask for
your cooperation and assistance in sustaining a campus that is
supportive of everyone. If you are a victim of or have knowledge of
these incidents, please contact the MSU police (355-2221). If at any
time you are a victim of or a witness to behavior that is contrary to
our values of inclusion, you should report them to the appropriate
person or office, including the MSU police, Office of Student Affairs
and Services (Interim Vice President, Denise Maybank) or the Office
for Inclusion and Intercultural Initiatives (Director, Paulette
Granberry Russell). Your residence hall mentors, cultural aides, and
the staff of Residence Life are ready to assist you. Please know that
we are committed to creating and maintaining a climate where all
members of the MSU community are welcome and respected.

Sincerely,

Lou Anna Kimsey Simon,
Ph.D. President

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,