sudo does not enhance security. Remove sudo and you will have a more
secure system. But if you want to give a non-root user the power to run
a few commands as root, sudo is a way to do that. sudo is open source
and it has been around for quite a while. Lots of very smart people
have inspected it for problems. There don't seem to be any surprises
lurking in it. sudo is configurable and it can easily be misconfigured.
So I trust sudo but I trust a system with sudo in use only after I
inspect the configuration. One better approach is to not need sudo or
anything like it. Need a command run as root? Contact an SA. Need
to run a command as oracle? Contact a DBA.
An alternative is RBAC (role based access control). The NSA (National Security Agency) assembled a team to develop an RBAC system for Linux and actually posted the source code on the net. I believe that the required kernel changes have been roled into the latest linux kernel. Some distros support RBAC. I don't know a lot about RBAC. Not too many people do... it's rather new. It could certainly be misconfigured as well.
An alternative is RBAC (role based access control). The NSA (National Security Agency) assembled a team to develop an RBAC system for Linux and actually posted the source code on the net. I believe that the required kernel changes have been roled into the latest linux kernel. Some distros support RBAC. I don't know a lot about RBAC. Not too many people do... it's rather new. It could certainly be misconfigured as well.
Comments
Post a Comment
https://gengwg.blogspot.com/