Skip to main content

What makes you a senior software engineer anyway?

I used to think a senior engineer was someone who gets a project, understands the context, puts their head down, and gets it done.
Here’s an article I wrote 3 years ago.
Are you a developer or an engineer? That’s a difference of some $20,000/year in salary đŸ˜‰
You get an amorphous blob of a project. What you do next defines you as an engineer or a developer. If you can take the amorphous blob and turn it into:
  • action steps
  • sub-projects
  • a staggered delivery plan (perhaps)
  • opportunities for work in parallel
  • a clear Thing To Do First™
  • a well-defined Thing That Says You’re Done™
…then you are an engineer. If somebody else has to do that, then you’re a developer.
That, I still think is true.
A developer, is someone who writes code, and an engineer is someone who designs solutions using code and systems. With some fuzziness around the edges between product and engineering.
Now here’s where it all changed for me and my career.
I used to think that “senior engineer” in Silicon Valley is just what you’d call an “engineer” in the rest of the world. Because titles are inflated and in San Francisco developers with 3 months of bootcamp experience are called engineers.
But no.
A senior engineer does so much more than just write code and design systems.
People at DayJob.exe used to say “Eh you’re okay, super talented engineer, but damn you’re hard to work with sometimes”
Now people who aren’t even on my team come up and say “Holy shit you’re absolutely killing it, what changed!?”
Not much.
I still write the same code at the same speed make the same bugs and constantly destroy production with my mistakes.
It’s the soft stuff.
I went from “hard to manage” to “doesn’t need to be managed at all”. A skill I used to have as a freelancer that eroded during my tenure as an employee. Oops

So how do you become a senior engineer?

Own the process. The whole process. Be the project manager you want to see in the world.
What that means to you and your organization varies. It’s hard to talk specifics. It’s the little things.
When product gives you a project, what happens next?
Do you wait for them to organize a kickoff meeting, make sure you understand the spec, keep asking you about progress, make sure you’re on time, look out for obstacles and help you clear them? Do they pester you about setting up QA, getting it through code review, and into production?
Or do you manage yourself.
You get the project. You read the spec. You ask questions.
Many questions. Until you are sure you understand both the spec and the spirit of the spec.
If the spec doesn’t match its spirit, do you talk to product and suggest improvements? Do you tell them hey this thing you’re asking for doesn’t solve your problem, but this other thing might?
Once the spec is clear and solves the problem, do you proactively find experts on the team to help with stuff you’re less familiar with? Schedule a chat or whatever to learn about their part of the system so you can do the things.
That’s what they’re there for by the way. Team members. They want to help you.
Hiding in the basement trying to figure it all out on your own is terrible team work. Yes, even if it means letting others work without distraction.
Once you’re coding, do you provide regular progress updates? Unprompted, unasked. Just a daily “Hey here’s what I did, here’s where we’re at, this is when I think we’ll finish”.

Certainty makes the difference

That certainty that stuff is happening and that when stuff stops happening they’ll know immediately means the world to your manager.
When you come to them and say “Yep gonna be done tomorrow” or you say “Nope won’t be done, here’s why”. It relieves anxiety like you wouldn’t believe.
If your manager can count on that little update at the end of the day, they will never bother you with status updates ever again.
They’re not asking to annoy you, they’re asking because they have no idea what’s going on.
And don’t worry about looking bad when you fall behind. Shit happens. If there’s a good reason, they’ll understand. Maybe help you prioritize better.
When you’re done, do you make sure your code gets tested, goes through QA, gets reviewed and so on? Do you sit there and pesterpolitely follow up with people until you all checks are donen? Do you work with QA and manage the whole process?
Basically: Can you cary a project from start to finish without your manager’s input?
Then you’re a senior software engineer.
Bonus points if you can do this for a team building a larger project together. Now you’re a team lead!
Cheers,
~Swizec

Learned something new? Want to improve your skills?

Join over 10,000 engineers just like you already improving their skills!
Here's how it works đŸ‘‡
Leave your email and I'll send you an Interactive Modern JavaScript Cheatsheet đŸ“–right away. After that you'll get thoughtfully written emails every week about React, JavaScript, and your career. Lessons learned over my 20 years in the industry working with companies ranging from tiny startups to Fortune5 behemoths.

Get thoughtful letters💌

 “Man, I love your way of writing these newsletters. Often very relatable and funny perspectives about the mundane struggles of a dev. Lightens up my day.  
~ Kostas”
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time. ✌️
Powered By ConvertKit
PS: You should also follow me on twitter đŸ‘‰ here. 
It's where I go to shoot the shit about programming.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened厜是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭厜是茁两揥case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps茁lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,