Skip to main content

What makes you a senior software engineer anyway?

I used to think a senior engineer was someone who gets a project, understands the context, puts their head down, and gets it done.
Here’s an article I wrote 3 years ago.
Are you a developer or an engineer? That’s a difference of some $20,000/year in salary đŸ˜‰
You get an amorphous blob of a project. What you do next defines you as an engineer or a developer. If you can take the amorphous blob and turn it into:
  • action steps
  • sub-projects
  • a staggered delivery plan (perhaps)
  • opportunities for work in parallel
  • a clear Thing To Do First™
  • a well-defined Thing That Says You’re Done™
…then you are an engineer. If somebody else has to do that, then you’re a developer.
That, I still think is true.
A developer, is someone who writes code, and an engineer is someone who designs solutions using code and systems. With some fuzziness around the edges between product and engineering.
Now here’s where it all changed for me and my career.
I used to think that “senior engineer” in Silicon Valley is just what you’d call an “engineer” in the rest of the world. Because titles are inflated and in San Francisco developers with 3 months of bootcamp experience are called engineers.
But no.
A senior engineer does so much more than just write code and design systems.
People at DayJob.exe used to say “Eh you’re okay, super talented engineer, but damn you’re hard to work with sometimes”
Now people who aren’t even on my team come up and say “Holy shit you’re absolutely killing it, what changed!?”
Not much.
I still write the same code at the same speed make the same bugs and constantly destroy production with my mistakes.
It’s the soft stuff.
I went from “hard to manage” to “doesn’t need to be managed at all”. A skill I used to have as a freelancer that eroded during my tenure as an employee. Oops

So how do you become a senior engineer?

Own the process. The whole process. Be the project manager you want to see in the world.
What that means to you and your organization varies. It’s hard to talk specifics. It’s the little things.
When product gives you a project, what happens next?
Do you wait for them to organize a kickoff meeting, make sure you understand the spec, keep asking you about progress, make sure you’re on time, look out for obstacles and help you clear them? Do they pester you about setting up QA, getting it through code review, and into production?
Or do you manage yourself.
You get the project. You read the spec. You ask questions.
Many questions. Until you are sure you understand both the spec and the spirit of the spec.
If the spec doesn’t match its spirit, do you talk to product and suggest improvements? Do you tell them hey this thing you’re asking for doesn’t solve your problem, but this other thing might?
Once the spec is clear and solves the problem, do you proactively find experts on the team to help with stuff you’re less familiar with? Schedule a chat or whatever to learn about their part of the system so you can do the things.
That’s what they’re there for by the way. Team members. They want to help you.
Hiding in the basement trying to figure it all out on your own is terrible team work. Yes, even if it means letting others work without distraction.
Once you’re coding, do you provide regular progress updates? Unprompted, unasked. Just a daily “Hey here’s what I did, here’s where we’re at, this is when I think we’ll finish”.

Certainty makes the difference

That certainty that stuff is happening and that when stuff stops happening they’ll know immediately means the world to your manager.
When you come to them and say “Yep gonna be done tomorrow” or you say “Nope won’t be done, here’s why”. It relieves anxiety like you wouldn’t believe.
If your manager can count on that little update at the end of the day, they will never bother you with status updates ever again.
They’re not asking to annoy you, they’re asking because they have no idea what’s going on.
And don’t worry about looking bad when you fall behind. Shit happens. If there’s a good reason, they’ll understand. Maybe help you prioritize better.
When you’re done, do you make sure your code gets tested, goes through QA, gets reviewed and so on? Do you sit there and pesterpolitely follow up with people until you all checks are donen? Do you work with QA and manage the whole process?
Basically: Can you cary a project from start to finish without your manager’s input?
Then you’re a senior software engineer.
Bonus points if you can do this for a team building a larger project together. Now you’re a team lead!
Cheers,
~Swizec

Learned something new? Want to improve your skills?

Join over 10,000 engineers just like you already improving their skills!
Here's how it works đŸ‘‡
Leave your email and I'll send you an Interactive Modern JavaScript Cheatsheet đŸ“–right away. After that you'll get thoughtfully written emails every week about React, JavaScript, and your career. Lessons learned over my 20 years in the industry working with companies ranging from tiny startups to Fortune5 behemoths.

Get thoughtful letters💌

 “Man, I love your way of writing these newsletters. Often very relatable and funny perspectives about the mundane struggles of a dev. Lightens up my day.  
~ Kostas”
No spam. Unsubscribe at any time. ✌️
Powered By ConvertKit
PS: You should also follow me on twitter đŸ‘‰ here. 
It's where I go to shoot the shit about programming.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec