Skip to main content

Grep Bracket Expressions

 

By placing a group of characters within brackets (\[ and \]), you can specify that the character at that position can be any one character found within the bracket group.

For example, to find the lines that contain too or two, you would specify those variations succinctly by using the following pattern:

  • grep "t[wo]o" GPL-3
 

The output shows that both variations exist in the file:

Output
your programs, too. freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: a computer network, with no transfer of a copy, is not conveying. System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge. ... ...

Bracket notation gives you some interesting options. You can have the pattern match anything except the characters within a bracket by beginning the list of characters within the brackets with a ^ character.

This example is like the pattern .ode, but will not match the pattern code:

  • grep "[^c]ode" GPL-3
 

Here’s the output you’ll see:

Output
1. Source Code. model, to give anyone who possesses the object code either (1) a the only significant mode of use of the product. notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:

Notice that in the second line returned, there is, in fact, the word code. This is not a failure of the regular expression or grep. Rather, this line was returned because earlier in the line, the pattern mode, found within the word model, was found. The line was returned because there was an instance that matched the pattern.

Another helpful feature of brackets is that you can specify a range of characters instead of individually typing every available character.

This means that if you want to find every line that begins with a capital letter, you can use the following pattern:

  • grep "^[A-Z]" GPL-3
 

Here’s the output you’ll see:

Output
GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of License. Each licensee is addressed as "you". "Licensees" and Component, and (b) serves only to enable use of the work with that Major Component, or to implement a Standard Interface for which an System Libraries, or general-purpose tools or generally available free Source. User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a ... ...

Due to some legacy sorting issues, it is often more accurate to use POSIX character classes instead of character ranges like you just used.

There are many character classes that are outside of the scope of this guide, but an example that would accomplish the same procedure as the previous example uses the \[:upper:\] character class within a bracket selector:

  • grep "^[[:upper:]]" GPL-3
 

The output will be the same as before.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,