Skip to main content

Understanding TUN TAP Interfaces

 https://www.naturalborncoder.com/virtualization/2014/10/17/understanding-tun-tap-interfaces/

As I mentioned in the previous article Understanding Bridges, Linux and most other operating systems have the ability to create virtual interfaces which are usually called TUN/TAP devices. This article will discuss those devices with particular focus on how they are used in OpenStack.

Typically a network device in a system, for example eth0, has a physical device associated with it which is used to put packets on the wire. In contrast a TUN or a TAP device is entirely virtual and managed by the kernel. User space applications can interact with TUN and TAP devices as if they were real and behind the scenes the operating system will push or inject the packets into the regular networking stack as required making everything appear as if a real device is being used.

You might wonder why there are two options, surely a network device is a network device and that’s the end of the story. That’s partially true but TUN and TAP devices aim to solve different problems.

TUN Interfaces

TUN devices work at the IP level or layer three level of the network stack and are usually point-to-point connections. A typical use for a TUN device is establishing VPN connections since it gives the VPN software a chance to encrypt the data before it gets put on the wire. Since a TUN device works at layer three it can only accept IP packets and in some cases only IPv4. If you need to run any other protocol over a TUN device you’re out of luck. Additionally because TUN devices work at layer three they can’t be used in bridges and don’t typically support broadcasting.

TAP Interfaces

TAP devices, in contrast, work at the Ethernet level or layer two and therefore behave very much like a real network adaptor. Since they are running at layer two they can transport any layer three protocol and aren’t limited to point-to-point connections. TAP devices can be part of a bridge and are commonly used in virtualization systems to provide virtual network adaptors to multiple guest machines. Since TAP devices work at layer two they will forward broadcast traffic which normally makes them a poor choice for VPN connections as the VPN link is typically much narrower than a LAN network (and usually more expensive).

Managing Virtual Interfaces

It really couldn’t be simpler to create a virtual interface:

ip tuntap add name tap0 mode tap
ip link show

The above command creates a new TAP interface called tap0 and then shows some information about  the device. You will probably notice that after creation the tap0 device reports that it is in the down state. This is by design and it will come up only when something binds it (see here). The output of the show command will look something like this:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default
 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
 link/ether 08:00:27:4a:5e:e1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: tap0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 500
 link/ether 36:2b:9d:5c:92:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

To remove a TUN/TAP interface just replace “add” in the creation command with “del”. Note that you have to specify the mode when deleting, presumably you can create both a tun and a tap interface with the same name.

Creating Veth Pairs

A pair of connected interfaces, commonly known as a veth pair, can be created to act as virtual wiring. Essentially what you are creating is a virtual equivalent of a patch cable. What goes in one end comes out the other. The command to create a veth pair is a little more complicated than some:

ip link add ep1 type veth peer name ep2

 This will create a pair of linked interfaces called ep1 and ep2 (ep for Ethernet pair, you probably want to choose more descriptive names). When working with OpenStack, especially on a single box install, it’s common to use veth pairs to link together the internal bridges. It is also possible to add IP addresses to the interfaces, for example:

ip addr add 10.0.0.10 dev ep1
ip addr add 10.0.0.11 dev ep2

Now you can use ip address show to check the assignment of IP addresses which will output something like this:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default
 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
 inet6 ::1/128 scope host
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
 link/ether 08:00:27:4a:5e:e1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 inet 192.168.1.141/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
 inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fe4a:5ee1/64 scope link
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: ep2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
 link/ether fa:d3:ce:c3:da:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 inet 10.0.0.11/32 scope global ep2
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: ep1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
 link/ether e6:80:a3:19:2c:10 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 inet 10.0.0.10/32 scope global ep1
 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Using a couple of parameters on the ping command shows us the veth pair working:

ping -I 10.0.0.10 -c1 10.0.0.11
PING 10.0.0.11 (10.0.0.11) from 10.0.0.10 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.0.0.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.036 ms
--- 10.0.0.11 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.036/0.036/0.036/0.000 ms

The -I parameter specifies the interface that should be used for the ping. In this case the 10.0.0.10 interface what chosen which is a pair with 10.0.0.11 and as you can see the ping is there and back in a flash. Attempting to ping anything external fails since the veth pair is essentially just a patch cable (although ping’ing eth0 works for some reason).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,