Skip to main content

My Priority Date is Current, Am I Eligible for Additional H-1B Extensions?

 

For H-1B workers who have been subject to per-country visa limitations and unable to file an application to adjust status (I-485), you are probably familiar with the ability to continue to extend H-1B status beyond the six-year limit in three-year increments based on your approved I-140 immigrant petition. These requests for H-1B extensions are made under the provisions of Section 104(c) of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21). But, what happens when the immigrant visa finally becomes available and the priority date is current? Is it possible to continue to extend the H-1B?

Another provision of AC21 may allow continued extensions of H-1B status in one-year increments according to Section 106(b). In order to be eligible to file an H-1B extension beyond the six-year limit after your priority date (Final Action Date) becomes current,

  1. your labor certification or I-140 petition must have been filed at least 365 days before you reached your six-year limit of H-1B time, and
  2. you’ll need to file your I-485 application for adjustment of status within one year of your Final Action Date becoming current (if outside the US, you would need to apply for an immigrant visa within one year).

If you meet these requirements, you may continue to extend your H-1B status in one-year increments until a final decision is made to approve or deny your pending I-485 application.

What if you are unable to file your I-485 application for adjustment of status within one year of your Final Action Date becoming current, such as the situation when you are no longer with the employer that sponsored your labor certification and I-140 petition?

According to the regulations revised in 2017, an H-1B worker is generally ineligible for continued extensions beyond the six year limit if he or she is the beneficiary of an approved I-140 immigrant petition and fails to file an adjustment of status application within 1 year of an immigrant visa being authorized for issuance based on his or her preference category and country of chargeability. However, USCIS may excuse a failure to file in its discretion if the H-1B worker establishes that the failure to apply for adjustment of status was due to circumstances beyond his or her control.

Where the adjustment of status could not be filed because the H-1B worker is no longer with the original sponsor, it will be up to the discretion of USCIS to decide whether this qualifies as a circumstance beyond the worker’s control in order to grant a one-year H-1B extension. It may be helpful to document the steps the new employer has taken to file a labor certification on behalf of the employee.

Also note that if the accrual of the 1-year period is interrupted by the unavailability of an immigrant visa, such as when a priority date becomes current and later retrogresses, a new 1-year period starts when the priority date becomes current again.  

What if the labor certification was filed less than 365 days before the six year limit was reached and the priority date is now current? Unfortunately, there is no ability to extend an H-1B that is already beyond the six-year limit any further. Even though the H-1B worker was able to extend the H-1B in three-year increments based upon the approved I-140 under AC21 Section 104(c), the worker will not be able to extend under 106(b) where the labor certification was filed after the worker began his or her sixth year of H-1B time. An individual in this situation would need to file an adjustment of status and use the employment authorization (EAD) card received based on that application in order to continue to work. If the current H-1B expires before the EAD card is received, the individual will no longer be authorized to work until the EAD card is received.

Comments

  1. Is it true? I read it any be filed anytime in the future unless law changed? Of cause the bona fide job offer has to be there and your I-140 is still in good standing.

    ReplyDelete

  2. If you're in the US and the I-140 is in USCIS custody, then usually there is no problem with filing the I-485 late.

    If you're outside the US and the I-140 is with the NVC, they may terminate it if you don't apply for an immigrant visa after your date has been current for 1 year. In that case you lose the priority date from that I-140.

    USCIS theoretically could also terminate I-140s for the same reason, but I haven't heard of them actually doing so.

    ReplyDelete

  3. Yes, I think if you come back to the US more than 1 year later you should still be able to file the I-485. Anecdotally, there have been some stories on the forum about people who filed after more than 1 year. However I cannot promise that USCIS will not change its policy later.

    ReplyDelete
  4. https://www.murthy.com/2011/12/02/priority-date-finally-current-how-soon-should-i-485-be-filed/

    ReplyDelete
  5. https://www.rnlawgroup.com/my-priority-date-is-current-am-i-eligible-for-additional-h-1b-extensions/

    ReplyDelete


  6. You must file within one year of your PD becoming "current", otherwise could risk having your case cancelled due to "abandonment."

    ReplyDelete


  7. The government could cancel your priority date if you don't apply for a green card within one year.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 兄弟,放平心态就行,公司里面没有6变形战士,每家公司都有一个大家可以喷的点,亚麻的pip,脸的卷和perm,🐶的升职速度,软的💰,每家都有自己最“忠实”的黑粉,大家吐槽自己又不会掉块肉,也没必要给公司正名啥的,有的人在好公司的烂组,有的人在一般公司的天堂组,就比如我,我在一家可能💰多一些的厂,但是我的梦司就是软,每当听到朋友说软💰多么多么少,我就想说,我就不能选个wlb好的,稳一点的厂吗? 别的公司多的那点钱还不如我一年收的租的多。自己给自己的生活就行

    ReplyDelete
  9. meta企业文化太烂 一个meta一个tiktok 拉黑保平安

    ReplyDelete
  10. meta有好有坏,好的就是pay不错,公司比较稳定。. 1point3acres
    . Χ
    坏的就是比较卷,wlb差,有pip,另外代码shit比较多,对Eng来讲未必很好。

    ReplyDelete
  11. 我后来发现refresh 一点儿用都没有, 完全无法跟init grant 抗衡,不在一个数量级,连续 high performing,但是四年过后仅靠refresh依然总包骤降
    所以跳槽拿包裹都不care refresh了,前四年比较重要, 四年升1--2级马上跳一次槽。
    只有在想永远待下去的厂,才会考虑refresh,比如想退休了

    ReplyDelete

  12. 很卷:你又是terminal level e5,又找到了不卷的组,其他那些不是5的怎么办?你应该知道有非升即走的政策吧?
    代码屎:是不是你不需要处理屎代码,所以你不痛苦?那是因为有别人替你痛苦了
    Perm问题:你不在美国,不需要绿卡,就不要替别人说这不重要

    ReplyDelete
  13. META是IT界最不卷的公司了,大家不需要打个你死我活地才能升职,大家都能升,还升很快,升职意味收入大增,不象其它美国it公司想着法子lowball,或拖着不给升职。当然大多数人进不去,连拿到面试机会都不容易

    ReplyDelete
  14. 脸的钱是真的多,等拿了卡脸会变成很多人的dream。但没卡之前,不好意思他可能都不在考虑范围(btw前段时间的有一个帖子不是脸的hr说现在只收绿卡了么)

    ReplyDelete
  15. 我觉得最大的问题在于业务线太窄。而且全靠metrics根本做不出能质变的东西。希望metaverse能成功吧。

    ReplyDelete
  16. 见不得别人好是人的天性,尤其是在匿名论坛,更容易表现出来这种天性。Meta对员工真心不错。用户可以喷Meta,但程序员真没必要,没有Meta这条大方的活鲶鱼,大家都pay要整体降一个档次

    ReplyDelete

  17. 加州大学校长田长霖身边的FBI线人
    最近美国政府公开的档案里,有一份FBI编号145的文件,是FBI收集的加州大学第一位
    亚裔校长田长霖的档案。



    从这份文档,我们可以知道FBI从1973年开始对田长霖进行监视,一直到1998年,长达
    25年。 田长霖1997年退休



    这份近500页的文档,绝大部分是一位田长霖身边的人写给FBI的报告。这些报告包罗万
    象,事无巨细,从田长霖的社会活动,交往关系,生活习惯癖好,直到平常的言行举止。



    公开的文档里,FBI已经抹掉了这位线人的姓名和身份。但是这些报告本身还是提供了
    这位线人的蛛丝马迹



    可以确定,这位线人



    1,是位华裔,不但本人是田长霖的密友,其家庭也和田长霖的家人关系密切。报告中
    多处提到了两家人的聚会,和共同的度假旅游

    2,是位学术上有一定成就的学者,这位线人在上个世纪70,80年代,多次受到中国的
    邀请,去讲学访问。



    这位线人忠于职守,兢兢业业,在25年的时段里,一共提交了近400份报告。

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

https://gengwg.blogspot.com/

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,