Skip to main content

Item 44: Say what you mean; understand what you're saying.

Item 44: Say what you mean; understand what you're saying.
In the introduction to this section on inheritance and object-oriented design, I emphasized the importance of
understanding what different object-oriented constructs in C++ mean. This is quite different from just knowing
the rules of the language. For example, the rules of C++ say that if class D publicly inherits from class B, there
is a standard conversion from a D pointer to a B pointer; that the public member functions of B are inherited as
public member functions of D, etc. That's all true, but it's close to useless if you're trying to translate your design
into C++. Instead, you need to understand that public inheritance means isa, that if D publicly inherits from B,
every object of type D isa object of type B, too. Thus, if you mean isa in your design, you know you have to use
public inheritance.
Saying what you mean is only half the battle. The flip side of the coin is understanding what you're saying, and
it's just as important. For example, it's irresponsible, if not downright immoral, to run around declaring member
functions nonvirtual without recognizing that in so doing you are imposing constraints on subclasses. In declaring
a nonvirtual member function, what you're really saying is that the function represents an invariant over
specialization, and it would be disastrous if you didn't know that.
The equivalence of public inheritance and isa, and of nonvirtual member functions and invariance over
specialization, are examples of how certain C++ constructs correspond to design-level ideas. The list below
summarizes the most important of these mappings.
 A common base class means common traits. If class D1 and class D2 both declare class B as a base, D1
and D2 inherit common data members and/or common member functions from B. See Item 43.
 Public inheritance means isa. If class D publicly inherits from class B, every object of type D is also an
object of type B, but not vice versa. See Item 35.
 Private inheritance means is-implemented-in-terms-of. If class D privately inherits from class B,
objects of type D are simply implemented in terms of objects of type B; no conceptual relationship exists
between objects of types B and D. See Item 42.
 Layering means has-a or is-implemented-in-terms-of. If class A contains a data member of type B,
objects of type A either have a component of type B or are implemented in terms of objects of type B. See
Item 40.
The following mappings apply only when public inheritance is involved:
 A pure virtual function means that only the function's interface is inherited. If a class C declares a
pure virtual member function mf, subclasses of C must inherit the interface for mf, and concrete subclasses
of C must supply their own implementations for it. See Item 36.
 A simple virtual function means that the function's interface plus a default implementation is
inherited. If a class C declares a simple (not pure) virtual function mf, subclasses of C must inherit the
interface for mf, and they may also inherit a default implementation, if they choose. See Item 36.
 A nonvirtual function means that the function's interface plus a mandatory implementation is
inherited. If a class C declares a nonvirtual member function mf, subclasses of C must inherit both the
interface for mf and its implementation. In effect, mf defines an invariant over specialization of C. See
Item 36.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,