Skip to main content

清华控股出资230亿美元欲收购美国美光科技(Micron Technology)

http://gengwg.blogspot.com/美光科技(Micron Technology)目前是全球最大的记忆体存储与影像感测器生产商之一。主要产品包括DRAM、NAND快闪记忆体和CMOS影像感测器,其它半导体元件和记忆体模组。

美光科技一直不景气,清华控股出的价是估价+20%。能否被美国政府批准,还难说。


华尔街日报报道:


State-Owned Chinese Chip Maker Tsinghua Unigroup Makes $23 Billion Bid for Micron
If it goes through, deal would be biggest Chinese takeover of a U.S. company

A Chinese state-owned company has prepared a $23 billion bid to buy U.S. memory chip maker Micron Technology Inc., people familiar with the matter said, in what could be the largest foreign takeover by a Chinese firm.

Tsinghua Unigroup Ltd., China’s largest chip design company, is willing to pay $21 a share for Micron, a 19.3% premium over its Monday closing price, one of the people said. Shares of Nasdaq-listed Micron have fallen by nearly half in the past year. They closed at $17.61 on Monday.

A letter outlining Tsinghua’s bid has been presented to Micron, one of the people said.

A Micron spokesman said the Boise, Idaho, company hasn’t received a buyout offer and declined further comment.

Any deal would likely face close scrutiny by U.S. officials in Washington. One question is whether it would be reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States, a panel of representatives from more than a dozen departments and agencies across the U.S. government.

CFIUS, as the group is known, is charged with determining whether any foreign acquisitions or investments pose a security threat. But the process for determining whether a transaction is subject to CIFIUS review isn’t clear-cut. In many cases, firms involved with a transaction that might raise security concerns are expected to notify the committee, which is chaired by the Treasury Department, and that kicks off a review. However, in some cases, when a transaction isn’t referred to the government by the companies involved, government officials can choose to launch an inquiry of their own.

If CFIUS decides a deal poses a security threat, the transaction can be blocked. In other cases, the prospect of a negative CFIUS ruling has caused companies to drop a transaction on their own.

If a Micron deal goes through, it would dwarf all previous Chinese takeovers of U.S. firms. The previous record was Chinese meat processor Shuanghui International Holdings Ltd.’s $7.1 billion takeover of Smithfield Foods Inc. in 2013, according to data provider Dealogic.



The bid reflects a widening push by the Chinese government to build more domestic sources of semiconductors, which are crucial to consumer products like smartphones as well as equipment used for defense purposes. China is particularly weak in memory chips, having developed none of the key technology needed for the data-storing components.

“They have decided that they really have to buy somebody because they can’t deliver the intellectual property themselves,” said Handel Jones, who is president of the Silicon Valley consultancy International Business Strategies and has written books on China’s high-tech policy.

But a big question mark, Mr. Jones said, is whether the U.S. government would allow a foreign company to buy a supplier of such strategic components.

Micron makes a large portion of its chips in U.S. factories, but has large wafer-fabrication facilities in Asia, including in Singapore and Taiwan. It only has an assembly factory in mainland China.

“I think there is a reasonable probability there will be an issue with government approval given a deal of this size,” Mr. Jones said.

Beijing-based Tsinghua Unigroup already has several links to major U.S. companies. It acquired a controlling stake in Hewlett-Packard Co.’s China networking equipment unit in May. Intel Corp. announced last year it would buy a 20% stake in Tsinghua Unigroup for $1.5 billion.

Tsinghua Unigroup, which was founded in 1988 by China’s elite Tsinghua University, became China’s largest chip design firm in 2013 after acquiring two of the country’s largest mobile-chip firms, Spreadtrum Communications and RDA Microelectronics.

Micron, based in Boise, Idaho, is the last remaining U.S. maker of the widely used chips known as dynamic random access memory, or DRAMs. It is No. 2 behind Samsung Electronics Co. in that market, and makes the NAND flash memory used to store data in mobile devices such as smartphones.

Founded in 1978, Micron was once a tiny upstart that challenged much larger chip makers in Silicon Valley and around the world. Many manufacturers once made DRAMs, a technology so widely used it has sometimes been called the crude oil of the information age. But most U.S. companies dropped out of the market by the late 1980s, a result of stiff competition from companies in Asia.

Micron’s stock surged last year on stronger prices of memory chips and signs the market was consolidating to a smaller number of players. But Micron’s stock, which closed 2014 at $35.01, has slid lately on worries about the health of the personal-computer market, a major user of DRAMs.

Micron in June reported a 39% drop in profit for the third fiscal quarter ended June 4.

If completed, a Micron takeover would continue a recent wave of consolidation in the chip sector, driven in part by companies struggling to find growth by other means. The largest to date is a $37 billion cash and stock deal for Avago Technologies Ltd. to buy Broadcom Corp. , announced in late May. Shortly afterward, Intel Corp. announced a deal to buy Altera Corp. for about $16.7 billion in cash.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,