Skip to main content

被collect company追债了

被collect company追债了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep  2 19:48:06 2009, 美东)

As I work at collection department of a major credit card company (top 5), I
dont agree above opinions.

Here is a summary if you are too busy to read all this long post:
1. If already charge off, there is no big difference between paying and no
paying them at all since the damage to your credit score already happened
and will affect you in 7 years. If you still want pay them, you could pay
much less to settle down the case by negotiating with them. Based on
industry standard, you could pay 10% to 75% of your principle and completely
waived all fees and interest charge.Even you pay full amount without
negotiation, there is NO incremental benefit.

2. If not charge off yet, it is common to negotiate with the agency to pay
less than you original owe and get the case settle. The bottom line is only
pay full principle and waive all interest and penalty fee. Even you pay full
amount without negotiation, there is NO incremental benefit.

3. It is the same you pay the agency or your original creditor. Either of
them has legal liability to update your payment to all three major credit
bureaus.

4. No government will be involved at all unless your creditor will sue you.
Then it will become a legal action but due to higher cost to do that, your
company usually wont choose that option unless you owe them alot. Also they
will mail you that legal notice so you will know.So personally I believe
there is no impact to green card.

5. Talk to HR about this to see whether it is their mistakes. It is common
as well.

More info here:

These days due to current crisis and recession, volume of delinquent accts
grow bigger and bigger , it is very common that your original creditor sold
your amount to a collection agency at discounted rate, for example you owe
them $1000 and collection agency may buy it at price of $500, given the low
success rate. OR the agency may just work for the original creditor like
outsourced department.

Either way, if you pay them off, your case should be closed and the agency/
original creditor has legal liability to report back to all credit bureaus.
But that doesnt means you are back to normal and the consequence will
depends on whether you pay them before charge off (6 months after your late)

Worst Scenario: Already charge off OR you plan to ignore them and it will
charge off later
Consequence: Your credit score will be smashed and this amount will show as
charge off in all three credit bureau for 7 years. After 7 years it will
permanently removed. In these 7 years your current credit cards with other
creditors may be closed by them since they all see your charge off behavior
and you may not be able to open new credit card or get an auto loan or a
mortgage, and basically you'll have trouble to borrow money from any major
finance company. So you will live on cash.
Again, government will NOT be involved at all unless your creditor will sue
you and it becomes a legal action.
But if you already charge off, then the difference between paying them and
not paying at all wont be very much. Because your charge off record already
become public and will exist for 7 years, paying off now wont take it off.

Best Scenario: You just 0-5 months behind the original due day
Action: Call the agency ASAP and negotiate a deal with them,like waive some
of the amount, Ask them to update all bureau and give you a written letter
once done so.
Consequence: your delinquent status will show on all bureau but since you
settle down before charge off, most of finance company will avoid you for a
short term (1-2 years). As long as you are good during that 1-2 years, your
credit score will back to what ever you're.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,