Skip to main content

俄媒曝光马航事件真相


看的心惊肉跳 俄媒曝光马航事件真相?!


  文章转载自俄罗斯媒体文章,真实性未知

  Russia “Puzzled” Over Malaysia Airlines “Capture” By US Navy

  美国海军“俘获”马来西亚航班,俄罗斯“很困惑”

  A new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Main
Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU)
states that Aerospace Defence Forces (VKO) experts remain “puzzled” as
to why the United States Navy “captured and then diverted” a Malaysia
Airlines civilian aircraft from its intended flight-path to their vast and
highly-secretive Indian Ocean base located on the Diego Garcia atoll.

  今日在克里姆林宫流传一份新报告,该报告由武装力量总参谋部(GRU)的情报部
门完成。报告说,防空军(VKO)专家仍然“困惑”于为什么美国海军“俘获并转移”
一架马来西亚民航航班,从其原定路线到美海军位于印度洋上迭戈加西亚岛的巨大保密
基地。

  According to this report, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (also marketed
as China Southern Airlines flight 748 through a codeshare) was a scheduled
passenger flight from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing, China, when on 8
March this Boeing 777-200ER aircraft “disappeared” in flight with 227
passengers on board from 15 countries, most of whom were Chinese, and 12
crew members.

  按这份报告,马来西亚航班370(与中国南航748代码共享)为马来西亚科伦坡至中
国北京的常规客机,在3月8日该波音777-200ER飞机在飞行中“消失”,机上有来自15
个国家的227名乘客(多数来自中国),以及12名机组人员。

  当地时间3月9日,一架驻日美军的P-3C预警机从嘉手纳空军基地起飞,前往马来失
联客机疑似失事海域进行搜寻。



  Interesting to note, this report says, was that Flight 370 was already
under GRU “surveillance” after it received a “highly suspicious” cargo
load that had been traced to the Indian Ocean nation Republic of Seychelles,
and where it had previously been aboard the US-flagged container ship MV
Maersk Alabama.

  值得一提的是,该报告说,航班370早已处于GRU“监控”之下。此前它上面装了“
高度可疑的货物”,该货物来自印度洋国家塞舌尔,挂美国旗的集装箱船MV Maersk
Alabama号曾停泊于此。

  What first aroused GRU suspicions regarding the MV Maersk Alabama, this
report continues, was that within 24-hours of off-loading this “highly
suspicious” cargo load bound for Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the two
highly-trained US Navy Seals assigned to protect it, Mark Daniel Kennedy, 43
, and Jeffrey Keith Reynolds, 44, were found dead under “suspicious
circumstances.”

  报告说,MV Maersk Alabama号引起GRU怀疑,是因为(后来上马航370的)“高度
可疑”货物从船上卸载后24小时内,受命保护该货物得两名高度训练过的美国海军海豹
队员(43岁的Mark Daniel Kennedy和44岁的Jeffrey Keith Reynolds)死于“可疑的
环境”。

  Both Kennedy and Reynolds, this report says, were employed by the
Virginia Beach, Virginia-based maritime security firm The Trident Group
which was founded by US Navy Special Operations Personnel (SEAL’s) and
Senior US Naval Surface Warfare Officers and has long been known by the GRU
to protect vital transfers of both atomic and biological materials
throughout the world.

  报告说,这两个人受雇于位于佛吉尼亚的海上安全企业三叉戟集团Virginia分部,
该集团由美国海军特种部队(海豹)人事部门和高级军官建立,GRU早已知道他们负责
保护世界范围内的关键核、生化材料传递。

  Upon GRU “assests” confirming that this “highly suspicious” cargo
was aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 on 8 March, this report notes,
Moscow notified China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) of their
concerns and received “assurances” that “all measures” would be taken as
to ascertain what was being kept so hidden when this aircraft entered into
their airspace.

  GRU“断言”,此“高度可疑”货物在3月8日上了马航370,报告说,莫斯科就此提
醒了中国国家安全部并收到“保证”说会采取“一切措施”以弄清楚这里面藏了什么,
只要航班一进入中国领空。

  However, this report says, and as yet for still unknown reasons, the MSS
was preparing to divert Flight 370 from its scheduled destination of
Beijing to Haikou Meilan International Airport (HAK) located in Hainan
Province (aka Hainan Island)。

  然而,报告说,因未知原因,中国国安部准备转移370航班,从计划的北京路线到
位于海南的海口美兰国际机场。

  Prior to entering the People Liberation Army (PLA) protected zones of
the South China Sea known as the Spratly Islands, this report continues,
Flight 370 “significantly deviated” from its flight course and was tracked
by VKO satellites and radar flying into the Indian Ocean region and
completing its nearly 3,447 kilometer (2,142 miles) flight to Diego Garcia.

  报告继续说,在进入解放军保护的南中国海区域(南沙群岛)之前,370航班“大
幅偏离”其航线并(由航空军VKO卫星及雷达跟踪)飞入了印度洋区域,最终完成其
3447公里飞行到达迭戈加西亚。

  Critical to note about Flight 370’s flight deviation, GRU experts in
this report say, was that it occurred during the same time period that all
of the Spratly Island mobile phone communications operated by China Mobile
were being jammed.

  GRU专家说,关于370航班偏航,特别值得说明的是事件发生时整个南沙群岛的中国
移动手机通讯信号都被屏蔽了。

  2014年3月9日,美国海军参与搜寻马航失联MH370航班的阿利-伯克级导弹驱逐舰
DDG-91平克尼号,起飞SH-60R海鹰反潜机,赶到疑似失事海域进行搜寻。

  China Mobile, it should be noted, extended phone coverage in the Spratly
Islands in 2011 so that PLA soldiers stationed on the islands, fishermen,
and merchant vessels within the area would be able to use mobile services,
and can also provide assistance during storms and sea rescues.

  中国移动在2011年扩充了南沙劝导的手机覆盖范围,以方便守岛的解放军战士,渔
民,商船使用手机服务,也可在风暴和海事救援方面提供支持。

  As to how the US Navy was able to divert Flight 370 to its Diego Garcia
base, this report says, appears to have been accomplished remotely as this
Boeing 777-200ER aircraft is equipped with a fly-by-wire (FBW) system that
replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an
electronic interface allowing it to be controlled like any drone-type
aircraft.

  关于美国海军何以能让370航班转飞到其迭戈加西亚基地,报告说,似乎是通过远
程操纵该飞机的电传操控系统(FBW)以替代传统手工飞行控制,使用类似无人机的操
控界面。

  However, this report notes, though this aircraft can be controlled
remotely, the same cannot be said of its communication systems which can
only be shut down manually; and in the case of Flight 370, its data
reporting system was shut down at 1:07 a.m., followed by its transponder (
which transmits location and altitude) which was shut down at 1:21 a.m.

  然而,报告说,虽然飞机可以远程控制,其通讯系统可能只能手工关闭;具体到
370的情况,其数据报告系统于1:07被关闭,其位置报告系统于1:21被关闭。

  What remains “perplexing” about this incident, GRU analysts in this
report say, are why the American mainstream media outlets have yet to demand
from the Obama regime the radar plots and satellite images of the Indian
Ocean and South China Sea regions as the US military covers this entire area
from Diego Garcia like no other seas in the world due to its vital shipping
and air lanes.

  GRU分析员说,这次事件中仍然“令人困惑”的是为何美国主流媒体还没有要求奥
巴马政府提供印度洋和中国南海地区的雷达图及卫星图。美国军队从迭戈加西亚起覆盖
这片广大区域远超世界其它海域,由于位于航空、航海要冲位置。

  Most sadly, this report concludes, the US is actually able to conceal
the reason(s) for the “disappearance” of Flight 370 as they have already
done so after the events of 11 September 2011 when the then Bush regime “
disappeared” American Airlines Flight 77 and its 64 passengers and crew
after falsely claiming it hit the Pentagon, but which was confirmed by the
CNN News Service [see video HERE] not to have happened.

  报告总结,悲哀的是,美国实际上有能力隐藏370航班“消失”的原因。在2011年9
.11事件后,当时的布什政府使美国航空77航班及其64名乘客及机组人员“消失”,声
称它击中了五角大楼,但CNN后来确认攻击五角大楼这事没有发生。

  关于370航班偏航到迭戈加西亚,GRU报告说,最麻烦的是“几乎”立刻跟着来了至
少四架飞机,机上是美国疾病控制与方中心和中国疾病控制预防中心的顶级专家。

  As to why both American and Chinese disease experts were taken to Diego
Garcia where Flight 370 is now known to be, this report says, has as yet not
been answered by either of these governments after repeated Foreign
Ministry requests for “explanations and clarification.”

  至于为什么美国和中国疾病专家到迭戈加西亚(370航班所在),报告说,(俄)
外交部要求“解释澄清”之后,相关政府至今还没有回答。

  What is to be known, this report says, is that as Malaysia has been
forced to admit Flight 370 was, indeed, “diverted” from its flight path as
the GRU had previously reported, and as at least 25 nations are now
involved in searching for it, it remains a mystery as to what is actually
occurring.

  现在知道的,是马来西亚被迫承认,370航班如GRU前面说的偏离了原定航线。至少
25个国家卷入了搜索,至今实际发生的还是个谜。

  Also known, this report concludes, is that Diego Garcia as a designated
ETOPS emergency landing site for flight planning purposes of commercial
airliners transversing the Indian Ocean, and as one of 33 emergency landing
sites worldwide for the NASA Space Shuttle, it is “inconceivable” that any
type of aircraft, let alone Flight 370, can fly anywhere in the Southern
Hemisphere without being tracked, monitored and recorded in totality.

  报告总结,还知道的是迭戈加西亚是为商业航班横跨大西洋时指定的ETOPS紧急着
陆点,也是NASA航天飞机在世界上的33个紧急着陆点之一,“不可想象”任何航空器(
别说370航班)可能在南半球飞行而没有完整的跟踪、监视、记录。

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,