Skip to main content

Predicting The Next IPO Wave: The Era Of The Enterprise




Over the last three years, we’ve seen an increasing number of tech IPOs – many from consumer-facing companies that we’ve long known were headed for an IPO. I’m talking about Facebook, Twitter, Pandora, Yelp, Groupon, Zynga, etc., which most casual observers could see from a mile away. Markets tend to be swayed by sexy consumer offerings; however, we should be paying close attention to the massive shareholder value that is being created by enterprise software companies.

Enterprises are building rapidly growing top-lines, which are helping their customers run their businesses more efficiently and profitably. In fact, if you take out Facebook – a once-in-a-decade business – the market cap of the top five enterprise IPOs of the last two years is equivalent to the market cap of the top five consumer IPOs of the last two years. This includes Workday, ServiceNow, Splunk, FireEye and Tableau which combined have a market cap of around $55 billion depending on the day – about the same as Twitter, Pandora, Yelp, Groupon and Zynga. Who would have thought? But this is just the beginning for enterprise software IPOs.

With Castlight Health starting to trade today on the NYSE and rumors of Box filing for an IPO (both companies that I have invested in), we’re about to see a new wave of companies operating within the more mature era of web-based business. These are typically companies in the enterprise services space that have already nailed down their monetization models. For these companies, it is now all about rapid growth, and a public offering will be a key means of supporting that growth.

What makes this time particularly exciting is that we’re about to witness a perfect storm of:

Buoyant equity markets (Facebook and Twitter have been performing admirably while Zynga recently hit a one-year high);
a belief that “technology companies” as a category are a central economic pillar for accelerating productivity;
a wave of companies that have established themselves as important enterprise tools with accelerating adoption rates and long-term growth plans;
the public market investors love for recurring revenue companies that are predictable to evaluate and hence easier to invest in. In short, this breed of company is more sustainable, has its long-term growth path figured out, is being adopted by relevant markets and is met with a healthy appetite.
With this in mind, I thought it would be a useful exercise to outline 10 companies that I believe will be big players in this next wave of enterprise IPOs, along with what makes them uniquely positioned for continual relevance and success.

1. Atlassian. If the software developer is the “blue-collar” worker of the 21st century, then Atlassian’s products are a necessary part of their toolbox. You will hard-pressed to find a company developing its own software not using Atlassian’s products. What’s amazing about Atlassian is that it’s created a large business with minimal traditional sales and marketing commonly found in enterprise software companies of their scale. The lesson here is that developers do not like being sold to.

2. Box. Although considered a competitor to Dropbox, Box actually has a laser focus around serving the file storage, sharing and collaboration needs for the business community. Box takes into account the needs of the business user while also keeping in mind the needs of the IT buyer – think security and control. The company has leveraged its freemium business model and parlayed it into a 90 percent adoption rate at Fortune 500 companies. This process has allowed it to become the ubiquitous cloud-based file sharing and collaboration solution for these large enterprises, as well as lots of smaller ones. There is a lot of excitement around Box because it has the opportunity to be used by 1.5 billion knowledge workers worldwide.

3. Castlight Health has a specific industry focus that provides transparent price and quality information of healthcare services to employees at self-insured employers. This gives their employees the ability to shop for their healthcare. Castlight has done an incredible job of building a platform that can easily be deployed into an enterprise and can be offered to the complete employee base. This empowers employees to search and find the right doctor for them based on their specifications, including price, quality and their own deductibles or co-pays. This saves both employees and employers a significant amount of money when it comes to covering amounts over deductibles, and that hits both of their bottom lines. Castlight is helping reduce the cost of healthcare in the U.S. one company at a time.

4. DocuSign dominates the electronic signature market. CEO Keith Krach, who has been impressive at the helm, was previously the co-founder and CEO of Ariba, which he ran and took public in the go-go days of the late 90s and was later acquired by SAP for $4.3 billion in 2012. Krach knows a thing or two about building a large enterprise software business. The company has more than 48 million signers and has become the market leader as well as the industry standard for digital transaction management. I think we would all agree that most important documents, in the future, will be e-signed and managed through a service like DocuSign’s.

5. Hubspot is an all-in-one inbound marketing solution for marketers to use to attract, nurture and convert leads into new customers. While Eloqua (now part of Oracle) and Marketo duke it out on the enterprise side, Hubspot’s bread and butter is the SMB and small enterprise market. This enables it to compete against companies like Act-On Software (one to watch for 2015). And with more than 10,000 customers, Hubspot is on the coveted IPO path. You might ask, how can so many marketing software companies become billion-dollar companies? Well, the CMO/Head of Marketing will soon be spending more than the CIO and will need the tools to make the best decisions. Aside from that, marketers are less herd-driven and like to pick their weapon choice allowing more than one company in the sector to become big.

6. MongoDB has thrived in a world that has quickly moved to NoSQL databases to overcome the limitations of traditional relational databases. MongoDB started out as an open source project that over the last five years has become the preeminent NoSQL database for large enterprise companies. It has also become the norm for many new startups.

7. New Relic is a SaaS-based software analytics company that monitors web and mobile applications in real-time that operate in the cloud, on-premise or hybrid environments. The company has created a flexible platform that sits on top of any web application and provides powerful analytics. It is a great tool for software management and has quickly become a must-have for developer operations.

8. Twilio has dominated communication-as-a-service for both web and mobile products that need an SMS or voice component. Their big win? A simple API that has gotten tens of thousands of apps, websites, voice and messaging enabled in a hurry.

9. Zendesk is a SaaS help desk that provides solutions for ticketing, issue tracking and customer-service support. Zendesk has used branding to its advantage: I’d liken them to the Virgin America of help desk software, which has otherwise been boring, bland, and painful software. On top of that, Zendesk’s leadership understands the need to be customer-first when it comes to web applications, and has made it easy for customers to adopt and communicate.

10. Zuora is a SaaS-based subscription billing service that helps enterprises manage the entire lifecycle of subscriptions across e-commerce, billing and finances. Zuora was among the first few to recognize the shift toward a subscription economy and the need for a billing service that is not only easy to integrate but also highly scalable. Zuora is the most likely product that is used by nearly all the companies in this article, meaning that it has been part of the success of an entire generation of SaaS companies.

So what do these companies have in common? First, they are open for business 24/7, are easy to adopt and easy to deploy for customers. The friction to adopt and deploy enterprise software has dropped so dramatically that these companies are growing their revenues faster than ever before. Subscription pricing has made it more affordable and accessible for companies all over the world to buy robust, enterprise-grade software that was built for the scale of Fortune 500 companies.

It is also important to realize that most of these companies have been incredibly focused on solving a single need with their products, only branching off and building tangential services and features once the core need of their customers has been addressed. For most, this will only come after an IPO – there is still so much more room for growth with a single product, especially as the demand continues to grow worldwide.

We’ll see where things go from here, as an even newer batch of companies, like Act-On Software, AppDynamics, Asana, Clearslide, Cloudera, GitHub, Okta, Optimizely, RelateIQ, Zenefits and others, continue to grow, but I’m excited to see how the markets welcome what I view as a healthy period of technology-based enterprise companies.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,