Skip to main content

成功的人能超越自身,客观看待事物,并管理事物以塑造改变

他们能接受其他人的观点,而不是固执己见。他们能客观看待自身(包括自己的长处和弱点)和其他人,从而可以将正确的人安排在合适的位置,以实现他们的目标。如果你学会了这么做,你会发现几乎没有什么是你无法实现的。你只需要学习如何面对自身所处的现实,并把你能利用的所有资源用到极致。例如,假如作为设计者和管理者的你发现,作为工作者的你某件事情做不好,你就应该解雇这个作为工作者的你,找到一个好的替代者,而在此过程中你必须一直作为自身生活的设计者和管理者。如果你发现自己不擅长做什么,你不应该为此难过,而是应该为发现这一点感到高兴,因为知晓这一点并妥善应对,将提升你实现自身愿望的可能性。


如果你发现自己不能把所有事都做到最好,并为此难过的话,你就太幼稚了。没有人能把一切都做好。你会让爱因斯坦加入你的篮球队吗?如果爱因斯坦运球和投篮做得不好,你会看不起他吗?他应该为此感到耻辱吗?想想爱因斯坦会在多少领域无法胜任,再想想即使在那个他独步全球的领域,他付出了多少努力才变成如此优秀。 



看别人如何苦拼,让别人看你如何苦拼,会引发各种自我情绪,如同情、怜悯、难堪、愤怒、戒备等。你需要克服这一切,不再把苦拼视为负面的东西。人一生中最好的机会大多数来自苦拼的经历。苦拼是对人的创造性和个性的考验,你应该从这些考验中挖掘出最大的价值。 



面对自身缺点,你有4种选择: 

1.你可以否认缺点(这是大多数人的做法)。 

2.你可以承认缺点并应对缺点,努力把缺点转化为优势(能不能成功取决于你的自我改变能力)。 

3.你可以承认缺点并找到绕过缺点的方法。 

4.或者,你可以改变你的目标。你如何选择对你的人生走向至关重要。



第一种是最不好的选择,否认只会导致你不断地栽在自己的缺点上,不断经受痛苦,而不会有其他结果。



第二种选择,承认缺点的同时努力把缺点转化为优势,如果能成功的话,这也许是最好的做法。但有些事情你永远也不会擅长,改变也需要花费很多时间和精力。如果要用一个标准来判断你是否应该沿着这条路走下去的话,最好的标准是看你要做的事是否符合自己的特性(即你天然具有的各种能力)。



第三种选择,承认缺点的同时努力想办法绕过去,是最容易、通常也最可行的道路,但这是走的人最少的路。



第四种选择,改变自己的目标,也是一种不错的选择,但这需要你有很大的灵活性,能够克服自己的各种先入之见,努力找到和你匹配的目标并享受新的过程。



They can take in the perspectives of others instead of being trapped in their own heads with their own biases. They are able to look objectively at what they are like—their strengths and weaknesses—and what others are like to put the right people in the right roles to achieve their goals. Once you understand how to do this you’ll see that there’s virtually nothing you can’t accomplish. You will just have to learn how to face your realities and use the full range of resources at your disposal. For example, if you as the designer/manager discover that you as the worker can’t do something well, you need to fire yourself as the worker and get a good replacement, while staying in the role of designer/manager of your own life. You shouldn’t be upset if you find out that you’re bad at something—you should be happy that you found out, because knowing that and dealing with it will improve your chances of getting what you want.



If you are disappointed because you can’t be the best person to do everything yourself, you are terribly naive. Nobody can do every-thing well. Would you want to have Einstein on your basketball team? When he fails to dribble and shoot well, would you think badly of him? Should he feel humiliated? Imagine all the areas in which Einstein was incompetent, and imagine how hard he struggled to excel even in the areas in which he was the best in the world. 



Watching people struggle and having others watch you struggle can elicit all kinds of ego-driven emotions such as sympathy, pity, embarrassment, anger, or defensiveness. You need to get over all that and stop seeing struggling as something negative. Most of life’s greatest opportunities come out of moments of struggle; it’s up to you to make the most of these tests of creativity and character. 



When encountering your weaknesses you have four choices: 

1. You can deny them (which is what most people do). 

2. You can accept them and work at them in order to try to convert them into strengths (which might or might not work depending on your ability to change). 

3. You can accept your weaknesses and find ways around them. 

4. Or, you can change what you are going after. Which solution you choose will be critically important to the direction of your life. 



The worst path you can take is the first. Denial can only lead to your constantly banging up against your weaknesses, having pain, and not getting anywhere. 



The second—accepting your weak-nesses while trying to turn them into strengths—is probably the best path if it works. But some things you will never be good at and it takes a lot of time and effort to change. The best single clue as to whether you should go down this path is whether the thing you are trying to do is consistent with your nature (i.e., your natural abilities). 



The third path—accepting your weaknesses while trying to find ways around them—is the easiest and typically the most viable path, yet it is the one least followed. 



The fourth path, changing what you are going after, is also a great path, though it requires flexibility on your part to get past your preconceptions and enjoy the good fit when you find it.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,