Skip to main content

elevator design

 How can computer technology be integrated into an elevator system for a hundred story office
building? How do you optimize for availability? How would variation of traffic over a typical
work week, floor, or time of day affect this? How would you test this system?
Implement a model similar to thread scheduling models found in most multitasking OS. Some
points to consider:
Some floor may have higher priorities, like the executive's floor for instance. Calls from
those floors would always be serviced first.
The elevator should only stop at a floor for x number of seconds, to avoid monopolizing the
elevator. This time would be decreased during busy hours and increased during slow hours.
If, for some reason, a floor has an elevator call outstanding for some long period of time,
that floor's priority gets boosted so that it's serviced immediately.
Based on weight (or # of people or some other similar metric) the elevator car could know
when it's full and ignore calls until there is room for at least 2 people. Stopping for just one
person isn't worth it for a full elevator.
When the elevator is idle, it can go to the floor that will need the elevator the most or that
which has the highest priority. This will save on the wait time at that floor (e.g.: the ground
floor).
Since it is a 100 story bldg, it is highly likely that many elevators are servicing it. So there
needs to be coordination between the elevators to service properly. The elevators could be
programmed so that they only serve certain floors or floor ranges. This divide and conquer
strategy can be optimized by reducing the number of floors an elevator serves based on floor
location (e.g.: the higher the floor, the less number of floors an elevator serves).
In front of the entrance door of each floor, there could be placed a BIG poster/caricature
depicting the health benefits of climbing the stairs!! This could reduce the elevator traffic.
An alternative solution could be to optimize for availability using the Poisson statistical model. The
arrival of the people can be modeled as a Poisson distributed random variable with a set of curves
being collected over a period of time (one set of curves for every day of the week) and keep on
optimizing these set of curves using linear regression so as to obtain a single curve that is the "best-
fit" for that day.The elevator would thus stand at the floor where there is a maximum probability of availability of
people. A variation of traffic would mean that the set of points over which the curve fitting is done
would change, and thus the computer system would adapt to that change. This is closer to hard disk
operation: reading the track/sector that is closer to the head position. Then apply the rule to avoid
starvation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,