Skip to main content

Configure automated integration and functional test automation

 

The first thing that comes to mind when talking about Continuous Delivery is that everything needs to be automated.

Otherwise, you can't deploy multiple times a day. But how to deal with testing then?

Many companies still have a broad suite of manual tests to be run before delivering to production. Somehow these tests need to run every time a new release is created.

Instead of automating all your manual tests into automated UI tests, you need to rethink your testing strategy.

As Lisa Crispin describes in her book Agile Testing, you can divide your tests into multiple categories.

Agile testing quadrants.
Source: https://lisacrispin.com/2011/11/08/using-the-agile-testing-quadrants

We can make four quadrants where each side of the square defines our targets with our tests.

  • Business facing - the tests are more functional and often executed by end users of the system or by specialized testers that know the problem domain well.
  • Supporting the Team - it helps a development team get constant feedback on the product to find bugs fast and deliver a product with quality build-in.
  • Technology facing - the tests are rather technical and non-meaningful to business people. They're typical tests written and executed by the developers in a development team.
  • Critique Product - tests that are there to validate the workings of a product on its functional and non-functional requirements.

Now we can place different test types we see in the other quadrants. For example, we can put Unit tests, Component tests, and System or integration tests in the first quadrant.

In quadrant two, we can place functional tests, Story tests, prototypes, and simulations. These tests are there to support the team in delivering the correct functionality and are business-facing since they're more functional.

In quadrant three, we can place tests like exploratory, usability, acceptance, etc.

We place performance, load, security, and other non-functional requirements tests in quadrant four.

Looking at these quadrants, specific tests are easy to automate or automated by nature. These tests are in quadrants 1 and 4. Tests that are automatable but most of the time not automated by nature are the tests in quadrant 2. Tests that are the hardest to automate are in quadrant 3.

We also see that the tests that can't be automated or are hard to automate are tests that can be executed in an earlier phase and not after release.

We call shift-left, where we move the testing process towards the development cycle.

We need to automate as many tests as possible and test them.

A few of the principles we can use are:

  • Tests should be written at the lowest level possible.
  • Write once, run anywhere, including the production system.
  • The product is designed for testability.
  • Test code is product code; only reliable tests survive.
  • Test ownership follows product ownership.

By testing at the lowest level possible, you'll find many tests that don't require infrastructure or applications to be deployed.

We can use the pipeline to execute the tests that need an app or infrastructure. To perform tests within the pipeline, we can run scripts or use specific tests tools.

On many occasions, these are external tools that you execute from the pipeline, like Owasp ZAP, SpecFlow, or Selenium.

You can use test functionality from a platform like Azure on other occasions. For example, Availability or Load Tests executed from within the cloud platform.

When you want to write your automated tests, choose the language that resembles the language from your code.

In most cases, the application developers should also write the test, so it makes sense to use the same language. For example, write tests for your .NET application in .NET, and write tests for your Angular application in Angular.

The build and release agent can handle it to execute Unit Tests or other low-level tests that don't need a deployed application or infrastructure.

When you need to do tests with a UI or other specialized functionality, you need a Test agent to run the test and report the results. Installation of the test agent then needs to be done upfront or as part of the execution of your pipeline.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,