Skip to main content

Understand releases and deployments

 

One of the essential steps in moving software more quickly to production is changing how we deliver software to production.

It's common to have teams that need to do overtime on the weekend to install and release new software in our industry.

It's caused by the fact that we have two parts of the release process bolted together. As soon as we deploy new software, we also release new features to the end users.

The best way to safely move your software to production while maintaining stability is by separating these two concerns. So, we separate deployments from our release.

It can also be phrased as separating your functional release from your technical release (deployment).

What is a release, and what is a deployment?

When we talk about releases and deployments, we see that commonly used tools deal differently with the terminology as we did in the previous chapter.

To understand the concepts and the technical implementation in many tools, you need to know how tool vendors define the difference between a release and a deployment.

A release is a package or container containing a versioned set of artifacts specified in a release pipeline in your CI/CD process.

It includes a snapshot of all the information required to carry out all the tasks and actions in the release pipeline, such as:

  • The stages or environments.
  • The tasks for each one.
  • The values of task parameters and variables.
  • The release policies such as triggers, approvers, and release queuing options.

There can be multiple releases from one release pipeline (or release process).

Deployment is the action of running the tasks for one stage, which results in a tested and deployed application and other activities specified for that stage.

Starting a release starts each deployment based on the settings and policies defined in the original release pipeline.

There can be multiple deployments of each release, even for one stage.

When a release deployment fails for a stage, you can redeploy the same release to that stage.

See also Releases in Azure Pipelines.

Separating technical releases from functional releases

When we want to separate the technical and functional release, we need to start with our software itself.

The software needs to be built so that new functionality or features can be hidden from end users while it's running.

A common way to do this is the use of Feature Toggles. The simplest form of a Feature Toggle is an if statement that either executes or doesn't execute a certain piece of code.

By making the if-statement configurable, you can implement the Feature Toggle. We'll talk about Feature Toggles in Module 3 in more detail.

See also: Explore how to progressively expose your features in production for some or all users.

Once we've prepared our software, we must ensure that the installation won't expose any new or changed functionality to the end user.

When the software has been deployed, we need to watch how the system behaves. Does it act the same as it did in the past?

If the system is stable and operates the same as before, we can decide to flip a switch. It might reveal one or more features to the end user or change a set of routines part of the system.

The whole idea of separating deployment from release (exposing features with a switch) is compelling and something we want to incorporate in our Continuous Delivery practice.

It helps us with more stable releases and better ways to roll back when we run into issues when we have a new feature that produces problems.

We switch it off again and then create a hotfix. By separating deployment from the release of a feature, you make the opportunity to deploy any time of the day since the new software won't affect the system that already works.

Topics you might want to discuss are:

  • Does your organization need Continuous Delivery?
  • Do you use Agile/Scrum?
    • Is everybody involved or only the Dev departments?
  • Can you deploy your application multiple times per day? Why or why not?
  • What is the main bottleneck for Continuous Delivery in your organization?
    • The Organization
    • Application Architecture
    • Skills
    • Tooling
    • Tests
    • Other things?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigations Exam - Single Select

Last updated 4 Aug 11 Course Title: OWASP Top 10 Threats and Mitigation Exam Questions - Single Select 1) Which of the following consequences is most likely to occur due to an injection attack? Spoofing Cross-site request forgery Denial of service   Correct Insecure direct object references 2) Your application is created using a language that does not support a clear distinction between code and data. Which vulnerability is most likely to occur in your application? Injection   Correct Insecure direct object references Failure to restrict URL access Insufficient transport layer protection 3) Which of the following scenarios is most likely to cause an injection attack? Unvalidated input is embedded in an instruction stream.   Correct Unvalidated input can be distinguished from valid instructions. A Web application does not validate a client’s access to a resource. A Web action performs an operation on behalf of the user without checking a shared sec

CKA Simulator Kubernetes 1.22

  https://killer.sh Pre Setup Once you've gained access to your terminal it might be wise to spend ~1 minute to setup your environment. You could set these: alias k = kubectl                         # will already be pre-configured export do = "--dry-run=client -o yaml"     # k get pod x $do export now = "--force --grace-period 0"   # k delete pod x $now Vim To make vim use 2 spaces for a tab edit ~/.vimrc to contain: set tabstop=2 set expandtab set shiftwidth=2 More setup suggestions are in the tips section .     Question 1 | Contexts Task weight: 1%   You have access to multiple clusters from your main terminal through kubectl contexts. Write all those context names into /opt/course/1/contexts . Next write a command to display the current context into /opt/course/1/context_default_kubectl.sh , the command should use kubectl . Finally write a second command doing the same thing into /opt/course/1/context_default_no_kubectl.sh , but without the use of k

标 题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师

发信人: q123452017 (水天一色), 信区: I140 标  题: 关于Daniel Guo 律师 关键字: Daniel Guo 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 26 02:11:35 2018, 美东) 这些是lz根据亲身经历在 Immigration版上发的帖以及一些关于Daniel Guo 律师的回 帖,希望大家不要被一些马甲帖广告帖所骗,慎重考虑选择律师。 WG 和Guo两家律师对比 1. fully refund的合约上的区别 wegreened家是case不过只要第二次没有file就可以fully refund。郭家是要两次case 没过才给refund,而且只要第二次pl draft好律师就可以不退任何律师费。 2. 回信速度 wegreened家一般24小时内回信。郭律师是在可以快速回复的时候才回复很快,对于需 要时间回复或者是不愿意给出确切答复的时候就回复的比较慢。 比如:lz问过郭律师他们律所在nsc区域最近eb1a的通过率,大家也知道nsc现在杀手如 云,但是郭律师过了两天只回复说让秘书update最近的case然后去网页上查,但是上面 并没有写明tsc还是nsc。 lz还问过郭律师关于准备ps (他要求的文件)的一些问题,模版上有的东西不是很清 楚,但是他一般就是把模版上的东西再copy一遍发过来。 3. 材料区别 (推荐信) 因为我只收到郭律师写的推荐信,所以可以比下两家推荐信 wegreened家推荐信写的比较长,而且每封推荐信会用不同的语气和风格,会包含lz写 的research summary里面的某个方面 郭家四封推荐信都是一个格式,一种语气,连地址,信的称呼都是一样的,怎么看四封 推荐信都是同一个人写出来的。套路基本都是第一段目的,第二段介绍推荐人,第三段 某篇或几篇文章的abstract,最后结论 4. 前期材料准备 wegreened家要按照他们的模版准备一个十几页的research summary。 郭律师在签约之前说的是只需要准备五页左右的summary,但是在lz签完约收到推荐信 ,郭律师又发来一个很长的ps要lz自己填,而且和pl的格式基本差不多。 总结下来,申请自己上心最重要。但是如果选律师,lz更倾向于wegreened,